By Megan Chan
You may at first perceive this committee as quiet and peaceful. However, once speeches begin and POIs are exchanged, things start to get exciting!
A loud sound produced by the bang of chair Bernard’s gavel marked the commencement of council session in the Disarmament and International Security Committee. On the topic of discussing the effects of securty alliances on international peace, delegates eagerly listen to the delegates of Hungary.
Initially when discussing the topic of this committee, one must understand the historical development of the entirety of the issue. Accordingly, it is important to acknowledge that forming alliances may prevent the outbreak of military conflict initially, however it creates a back-and-forth dynamic military conflict and risk increasement. Currently there are many aspects that are notable for the world’s future security strategy, including the New Agenda for Peace July 2023. The main clashes of the issue include how there could be different specific roles perceived by each country, and regionalism’s legitimacy. Moreover, it is also important, as delegates have mentioned, to note the fact that this may not be in the best interest of developing countries. In 1945, the Arab League was formed, being the longest lasting major regional organization. As time went by, more and more alliances were established, including NATO, the EU and the SCO.
“As previously stated in my GSL “ said one of the delegates of Hungary enthusiastically, capturing delegates’ attention immediately with his loud and clear voice. The exchange of POIs had begun, with delegates showcasing their impressive research and speaking skills. The eagerness of all delegates really is shown in the placards that were raised in the air, hoping that the chairs would pick them for asking the speaking delegates a question. The delegate of China spoke in a confident voice, repeatedly asking the asking delegates to repeat their question, spoke of their view on “antagonistic policies” and displayed their good teamwork with each other. As they held up a piece of paper with “True!” on it, delegates laugh amidst North Korea’s speech. Meanwhile, the delegates request a fact check on North Korea’s claim on being the “Best country”.
After a long awaited GSL session, the unmoderated caucus had finally begun. Delegates spread across the room, eager to discuss with fellow delegates to form blocs and write resolutions to solve the issue at hand.
A Moderated caucus was voted upon, with delegates Pakistan, Kazakhstan and France being on the list of speakers. Discussing whether regionalism should be carried out before globalism. the delegate of Pakistan talks about how countries should solve their ongoing problems, and how globalism will help Pakistan more. “What we are trying to say is that it cannot be generalized that regionalism is the best solution for everyone”. Local needs are not often met in Pakistan, and globalization will help their socioeconomic situation. The USA delegates also recognised that globalization is important for multiple countries, where the 1985 Dayton Peace Accords were mentioned. In addition to this, the delegate of Kazakhstan mentioned about their geographic location and how regionalism would not be the best option.
Uniquely, this committee showcases the power of diplomacy on different aspects. From being perceived as a “silent” committee, delegates increasingly engaged in constructive dialogue, and showcasing their eagerness to fight for their perspectives, in order to create a better future. This is admirable to the world, as this conference paves the way to creating a better world, for everyone alive now and for generations to come.
As Day One of ISMUN comes to an end, we are eager to find out what this committee has coming for the chairs.
Comments